{NSFW} State Says “Choose Life” is “Patently Offensive”




Aborted-fetus-debate-29123384-1595-817The Second Circuit Court of Appeals holds that New York’s Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) has the right to ban “Choose Life” license plates on the grounds that such a statement is “patently offensive.” If drivers purchased the plates, the purchasing price was split between the DMV and the non-profit. The Children First Foundation (CFF), an organization promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion submitted [the “Choose Life” tag design]. The DMV claimed it was simply carrying out a ban on plates concerning politically divisive topics. Judge Rosemary Pooler, a Clinton appointee, agreed with New York’s position in her majority opinion. She took this view even though she also ruled that license plates are private speech subject to First Amendment protections. Despite these protections, however, she said that so many New Yorkers could find a plate advocating an anti-abortion position ”patently offensive” that the DMV was justified in suppressing the speech.

2369I wrote this article once already, but due to political correctness, it was pulled. Even though I followed the rules and gave all of the appropriate warnings, it was still evidently too graphic too show. I could not let it go. If there was ever a case that was so clear-cut between GOOD VERSUS EVIL….this is it. Now if a group of militant LGBT supporters submitted a rainbow tag, not a single word would be said. “Black Lives Matter”, “My Body/My Choice”, or “Feminist United”, nothing would be said. These would never fall into the “patently offensive” category; which by the way, is usually reserved for obscenity only. Choosing Life is the most important aspect of this case, but not the only aspect.

u12Mz. Pooler, you need to go back to what ever online legal school you attended and get a refund. You cannot have the Constitution both ways. Either there is freedom of speech or there is not, make up your mind. Just because someone might find “choose life” offensive does not, nor will it ever deem it “patently offensive”. That is the equivalent of saying a tag that says “breath” is “patently offensive” because somebody might get offended that you are emitting CO2 when you exhale!! You, Mz. Pooler need an education on what constitutes “patently offensive” and what does not. Furthermore, basing your legal ruling on some alleged, possible situation is so patently politically correct it is sickening. Mr. Clinton should have stuck to just screwing women instead of appointing them, because you, Mz. Pooler are a fine example of how badly he sucked at that job.





Mz. Pooler, do you have a better understanding of what is “choosing life” and what is “patently offensive”?? We, as a nation, have sunk so far into the quagmire that we are drowning in the muck. When “choose life” is “patently offensive”, we are already dying on our knees and too ignorant to see we never had a chance to fire the first shot on our feet.


Is This Really The “Most Radical Pro-Abortion Bill Ever Considered By Congress”?

Is This Really The “Most Radical Pro-Abortion Bill Ever Considered By Congress”?.

Call your Senators and Representatives. Do not let pass this bill!! I normally avoid commenting on abortion, but this needs to be shared. It needs to go viral and the phone lines of Washington, DC need to go down because of traffic over THIS bill. If you do not know who Dr. Gosnell is then google him, or better yet, Wikipedia him. They have a link to his trial transcripts with photos you do not want to see, because you will never be able to unsee them.

Bags and bags of babies and parts of babies stuffed in refrigerators and freezers, and piled up in the basement almost to the ceiling. They had been there for weeks. Jars of baby’s feet, just the feet, stacked up on a shelf in a closet. A fully formed male baby in a cardboard box shoved under the exam/operation table. Cat feces everywhere, including in the exam rooms. The exam tables caked in dried blood. He was known for doing late term, illegal abortions. You have cash, then it did not matter how pregnant you were, or how old you were, or where you were from. Women from out of state would frequently search for him and his special services.

Women would show up early, stripped from the waist down, given heavy doses of abortion drugs several times while waiting, and doses of pain medications, anti-emetic drugs, and tranquilizers. These women would sit in the ‘waiting’ room wrapped in a bloody blanket,(they did laundry one a week), in chairs contaminated with blood and cat urine and God only knows what else. Frequently, women would stand up to be ‘checked’ and the babies would FALL OUT. Gosnell would show up sometime that afternoon or evening. The women who had not already aborted were put on a table and the baby’s head sucked out, he would make an incision on the back of their neck and “snip”(Gosnell’s term) the spine, then pull the baby the rest of the way out. Sometimes the babies were still alive moving and crying, so he would bash their head. There was even one incident where a member of the staff PLAYED with the baby, before she killed it. Women were showing up at the local ERs with pieces of baby and placenta still inside of them. What I am telling you is just a tiny part of the horror revealed during this trial. ONE SUCTION TUBE IN THE WHOLE CLINIC, for removing the babies or intubation. THINK ABOUT THAT!!

Complaints from the ERs were made, but did HHS ever do inspections, no. The last one had been in 1993. Gosnell was a public figure. He ‘took care’ of his ‘community’. He was hailed a a wonderful, African American doctor. He opened his Women’s clinic in the worst area, to be convienent to his african american patients. Two of which he murdered.

Do you have a visual and olfactory sense of this clinic and it’s victims. Can you smell the cat feces, blood, and rotting flesh? Can you picture that fully formed baby boy haphazardly thrown into a cardboard box, a small cut on the back of his neck? Can you see the pile of unsealed, red plastic bags in the basement?

CAN YOU IMAGINE THIS BEING ALMOST LEGAL? This bill is too close to THIS reality.