{NSFW} State Says “Choose Life” is “Patently Offensive”




Aborted-fetus-debate-29123384-1595-817The Second Circuit Court of Appeals holds that New York’s Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) has the right to ban “Choose Life” license plates on the grounds that such a statement is “patently offensive.” If drivers purchased the plates, the purchasing price was split between the DMV and the non-profit. The Children First Foundation (CFF), an organization promoting adoption as an alternative to abortion submitted [the “Choose Life” tag design]. The DMV claimed it was simply carrying out a ban on plates concerning politically divisive topics. Judge Rosemary Pooler, a Clinton appointee, agreed with New York’s position in her majority opinion. She took this view even though she also ruled that license plates are private speech subject to First Amendment protections. Despite these protections, however, she said that so many New Yorkers could find a plate advocating an anti-abortion position ”patently offensive” that the DMV was justified in suppressing the speech.

2369I wrote this article once already, but due to political correctness, it was pulled. Even though I followed the rules and gave all of the appropriate warnings, it was still evidently too graphic too show. I could not let it go. If there was ever a case that was so clear-cut between GOOD VERSUS EVIL….this is it. Now if a group of militant LGBT supporters submitted a rainbow tag, not a single word would be said. “Black Lives Matter”, “My Body/My Choice”, or “Feminist United”, nothing would be said. These would never fall into the “patently offensive” category; which by the way, is usually reserved for obscenity only. Choosing Life is the most important aspect of this case, but not the only aspect.

u12Mz. Pooler, you need to go back to what ever online legal school you attended and get a refund. You cannot have the Constitution both ways. Either there is freedom of speech or there is not, make up your mind. Just because someone might find “choose life” offensive does not, nor will it ever deem it “patently offensive”. That is the equivalent of saying a tag that says “breath” is “patently offensive” because somebody might get offended that you are emitting CO2 when you exhale!! You, Mz. Pooler need an education on what constitutes “patently offensive” and what does not. Furthermore, basing your legal ruling on some alleged, possible situation is so patently politically correct it is sickening. Mr. Clinton should have stuck to just screwing women instead of appointing them, because you, Mz. Pooler are a fine example of how badly he sucked at that job.





Mz. Pooler, do you have a better understanding of what is “choosing life” and what is “patently offensive”?? We, as a nation, have sunk so far into the quagmire that we are drowning in the muck. When “choose life” is “patently offensive”, we are already dying on our knees and too ignorant to see we never had a chance to fire the first shot on our feet.


Is This Really The “Most Radical Pro-Abortion Bill Ever Considered By Congress”?

Is This Really The “Most Radical Pro-Abortion Bill Ever Considered By Congress”?.

Call your Senators and Representatives. Do not let pass this bill!! I normally avoid commenting on abortion, but this needs to be shared. It needs to go viral and the phone lines of Washington, DC need to go down because of traffic over THIS bill. If you do not know who Dr. Gosnell is then google him, or better yet, Wikipedia him. They have a link to his trial transcripts with photos you do not want to see, because you will never be able to unsee them.

Bags and bags of babies and parts of babies stuffed in refrigerators and freezers, and piled up in the basement almost to the ceiling. They had been there for weeks. Jars of baby’s feet, just the feet, stacked up on a shelf in a closet. A fully formed male baby in a cardboard box shoved under the exam/operation table. Cat feces everywhere, including in the exam rooms. The exam tables caked in dried blood. He was known for doing late term, illegal abortions. You have cash, then it did not matter how pregnant you were, or how old you were, or where you were from. Women from out of state would frequently search for him and his special services.

Women would show up early, stripped from the waist down, given heavy doses of abortion drugs several times while waiting, and doses of pain medications, anti-emetic drugs, and tranquilizers. These women would sit in the ‘waiting’ room wrapped in a bloody blanket,(they did laundry one a week), in chairs contaminated with blood and cat urine and God only knows what else. Frequently, women would stand up to be ‘checked’ and the babies would FALL OUT. Gosnell would show up sometime that afternoon or evening. The women who had not already aborted were put on a table and the baby’s head sucked out, he would make an incision on the back of their neck and “snip”(Gosnell’s term) the spine, then pull the baby the rest of the way out. Sometimes the babies were still alive moving and crying, so he would bash their head. There was even one incident where a member of the staff PLAYED with the baby, before she killed it. Women were showing up at the local ERs with pieces of baby and placenta still inside of them. What I am telling you is just a tiny part of the horror revealed during this trial. ONE SUCTION TUBE IN THE WHOLE CLINIC, for removing the babies or intubation. THINK ABOUT THAT!!

Complaints from the ERs were made, but did HHS ever do inspections, no. The last one had been in 1993. Gosnell was a public figure. He ‘took care’ of his ‘community’. He was hailed a a wonderful, African American doctor. He opened his Women’s clinic in the worst area, to be convienent to his african american patients. Two of which he murdered.

Do you have a visual and olfactory sense of this clinic and it’s victims. Can you smell the cat feces, blood, and rotting flesh? Can you picture that fully formed baby boy haphazardly thrown into a cardboard box, a small cut on the back of his neck? Can you see the pile of unsealed, red plastic bags in the basement?

CAN YOU IMAGINE THIS BEING ALMOST LEGAL? This bill is too close to THIS reality.

A Village Stripped by Lesbians

I’ve warned you that I am an equal opportunity offender. I am proud of this fact. I do not care who you think you are, if you do something universally offensive, it is my First Amendment Right to call attention to it. This time it is women, again, only this time it is a pair of ‘married’ lesbianazi’s from England. I first read about this story in WND and to say this had my blood boiling would be an understatement.
I do not understand people who think what they do in their bedroom ENTITLES them to run over the rest of the world. You’re gay, hey, more power to you, but do NOT shove it down my throat or anyone else’s. You expect everyone to respect your wishes, allow you to marry each other, have Christians bake your cakes and open their Israeli villages to you. Heaven forbid, someone take offense and refuse. Lawsuit time!!

That baker has every RIGHT to tell you NO! Just like the Israeli Village of Yad Hashmonah had the RIGHT to say NO. But because you belong to the ‘whisker biscuits only’ club you two think you have the RIGHT to trample this little village’s religious freedoms. NO, you don’t. They are exclusively a CHRISTIAN community. They live and die by the Bible. And in the Bible YOU ARE the abomination and I will publicly eat my Bible if you can find a single verse in the King James Version that explicitly says “Homosexuals are beloved in the eyes of GOD.”

I noticed something else in this article, you two lesbianazi’s did not give your names. Are you ashamed of who and what you are? I mean, you did, by a Judge’s orders, bankrupt a God Fearing, Bible-loving community because you think what you do in the bedroom gives you special rights. You are the reason they have lost a large portion of their income from renting out their banquet hall. Did that $20,000 make you two feel better about yourselves. Did those mean-spirited Bible people hurt your little feelings SO badly that you had to sue??!!

The other thing I noticed, was where you went, to a Jewish/Christian country. Why not Palestine? Or maybe Turkey or the city of Dubia? Because you knew number one, you’d both be arrested. Number two, after being found guilty of every sin in the Koran, you both would have been lashed and then stoned to death. Instead of suing this quaint little Christian Village, you should have done the right thing and found somewhere else to renew your ‘vows’. This was not an issue of YOUR GAY RIGHTS. It was about THEIR rights to live in peace and harmony with GOD and do what they thought was pleasing to GOD; these people were born, lived, and died there. See, you two went on your merry little way and went home 20 grand richer. This Village has to try it’s best to just survive. I really hope you are happy with yourselves. You have hurt an entire town because you perceived some kind of malice against you. It was not malice, it was a town trying to live in peace with GOD. The very SAME GOD that is going to cast the two of you into hell, or at least I hope so.

“ISMs and ISTs” and They are All Wrong

I am a white, single, heterosexual, conservative, Christian woman with no children, nor do I want them. I resent anyone, especially other women and politicians in general, deciding what is or is not appropriate for me. Here are my views and I do not care who I offend. In fact, I consider myself to be an “equal opportunity offender” and I am proud of it.
***********END OF DISCLAIMER**********

Feminism and feminists are a big part of what is wrong in American society today. Men and women are different. We have always been different and will always be different. This seems like stating the obvious, but unfortunately, feminists abhor this concept. They have tried to exploit these differences as a negative influence on society. They are wrong. This bears repeating: THEY ARE WRONG. Anyone, regardless of race, sexual preference, disability, or sex can be whatever they choose to be; they just have to be willing to work for it. And work hard, with the gifts that God has given them.

Yes, there are ‘glass ceilings’ and plenty of other “ISMs” and “ISTs” in our society. The government and especially blacks, gays, and women in government, cannot regulate this fact away. You deal with it. Feminists have been ruining the world for other women for generations. Prohibition is a good place to start. The push for the ban on alcohol began in the 1800’s as a feminist movement to keep their husbands at home and not out carousing the brothels. Wine and women and wives do not mix well. To give these women the benefit of the doubt, maybe it was a good idea, in theory. However, in reality, it gave us Organized Crime and NASCAR.

Some women resented the rights and freedoms that men had in America. So, before, during, and after prohibition it was the right to vote that women pursued aggressively. ‘Women’s Suffrage’. initially, women’s right to vote lead to a nullification of both their vote and their husband’s vote. Politicians seeing this trend, saw dollar signs and women being emotionally driven creatures, were easy to appeal to, and so the pandering to the female voter began and continues to this day.

After achieving the right to vote, women quietly plotted and pushed boundaries further than they ever had been before. The next MAJOR leap for women was the Women’s Liberation Movement which is ongoing, even today. Women wanted to become college educated, work outside the home, and run for political office. These goals are noble pursuits for single women and they should have equal income for equal output. But, once a woman has children, those goals are no longer noble. A woman should be the person raising her children, not a child care center, full of strangers. There have been too many cases of abuse at the hands of these strangers and at the expense of the normal development of the children.

Before and during part of the Women’s Liberation Movement there was a second, specific enterprise. The Sexual Revolution, and it was a revolution, it was an all out assault on normal relationships between men and women. Amidst all of this societal upheaval at the hands of women, we all lost something. The rules had changed. Men were put in the unenviable position of not knowing what were their rights and responsibilities. The point of no return was two-fold. Two events that defined the future of women, marriage, and families. First, the advent of the birth control pill and the second was Roe versus Wade.

Suddenly women had the freedom to have sex with whomever, where ever they wanted without the fear of pregnancy. Women became emboldened, even erroneously thinking they had reached the pinnacle of being equal with men. This was not a positive direction for America; some women took this change to be a ‘permission’ of sorts, to behave like tramps. A proud moment for women everywhere. Then in 1973, Roe versus Wade went before the Supreme Court and the most convoluted piece of adjudged law became the law of the land. Women could legally abort unwanted children. If the pill failed, women had another choice for freedom.

But at what cost? A nation’s innocence.

It is “women’s responsibilities” not rights, that are at issue here. What human being on the face of the earth, really wants to go into combat? Yet, feminists consider this to be a ‘women’s rights’ success. These are the women that are hurting women with their sociopathic ideals of male achievements that they think all women should aspire to. Feminists are politically more damaging to women than any male politicians. Feminists are not representative of all women they are just louder. The destruction of the family can be placed squarely at the feet of feminists. We no longer have husbands, we have ‘baby daddies’. Meals around the dinner table, with real discussions are a thing of the past. Children are not being raised by loving parents, they are simply surviving the best way they can, with little supervision. The parents that are loving, that do know what is going on with their kids are too few.

Some of us, actually miss the times when men were men and that was a trait to be admired. Women in suits and loud exultations of the unfairness toward women have ruined life as we knew it. They took the feminine mystique out of the equation. Some of us liked being treated like we were something special, to be treasured by all men.

From Disney Darling to…

I cannot believe that I am writing this. Virtually the entire world saw Miley Cyrus’s performance at the MTV Awards and I actually felt embarrassment for her. Her parents have to be mortified. Is she really that starved for attention? And what was the whole teddy bear thing? It’s almost like she’s stuck between rebellious teenager and adult. I wondered if she was on something or maybe needs some mental health help.
No one should really be surprised to see this kind of behavior, and worse, from this generation and the one’s to follow. We have become a society that is pandering to the least common denominator. That should not be a big surprise, either. Political correctness has insidiously invaded every facet of our lives. Slowly tearing away at the moral fiber that has kept this country strong. everyone, almost exclusively Caucasians, are afraid to speak up and tell the truth for fear of ‘offending’ someone.